ï»¿I’m Not Really a Lumberjack and I’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of those two tales of violence happened in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some unsuspecting slots machines after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.

‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this might be one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a really man that is quiet. He just stepped in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.

Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an offensive weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The next of those two stories is really a bit more frightening, since the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a member of the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making off with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.

A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping weapon.

The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.

Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.

Whose Casino Is It Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

While each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The appropriate choice is linked to the concept that neighboring communities will be affected by casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of applicants whom have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, as an example.

When it comes to your proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston areas.

‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’

According to the state laws that produced the chance for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t visited an answer on their own.

Conley has proposed going for a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He might have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power on the whole vote. In other terms, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city to be able to be approved.

Yay or Nay?

While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston world survey discovered that six associated with the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole city to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% were in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Regardless if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier recreations company that is betting.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a wagering store critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.

Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one associated with the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’

‘we understand there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for more chilli slot machine youtube jackpot the politician.

Spared on a Technicality

But, fighting back in the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance using the guidelines and properly declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.

And even though Goulden is no longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether it’s a totally innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.

‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.

Umunna, who is thought to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year their office had been accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.